This photograph was taken by William Dassonville and is named Eucalyptus - San Francisco. It was taken in c. 1925. He photographed many scenes of nature in North California. He was born in Sacramento, and became interested in photography as a young boy.From the credit line, it read that this picture was taken in San Francisco around 1925. I think that it's amazing how great of condition the photograph is in. At first, I thought that Dassonville was a modern photographer because this picture seemed to look as if it were taken within this century. But it amazed me when I found information that he was born in 1879, and then died in 1957.
I found this angle of the eucalyptus trees soft, and I enjoy the lighting of how the trees as if it were a silhouette. I think of the trees as a silhouette because of the way that the sun and the cloud are behind the trees, making the tree against the light as a silhouette. I also like the color of the picture which may have been because of the picture's age, but I like the way the picture isn't just black, white, and gray, but it's almost like a soft sepia color. Plus, the picture itself has a soft, glow-y feel, and I like it when pictures are soft, and not always exactly sharp and grainy. I find that the colors are very well contrasted, almost like a black and white photo, but in what looks like a dark brown and cream color.
I think what Dassonville was trying to interpret was that anything as simple as trees can look beautiful. Also, that great lighting can make a very big impact. I believe that he also wants his audience to know that details aren't always needed to make a point. Lastly, I think that he wants us, his audience, to realize that you don't need to go to exotic places to take amazing pictures. This picture was taken in San Francisco, probably a local place, and he probably wants us to know that you could even take a great picture in your backyard.
This picture of eucalyptus trees is very successful. It gives off a local, home-y feel, and the silhouette lighting is wonderful. It kept my interest and it made me think, like when I thought that the picture was very recent, when in fact it was taken almost a century ago. I think it's interesting to look at because I enjoy silhouettes, but the fact that it's not a silhouette portrait and they're silhouette trees is impressive. I wouldn't change anything in the photograph because if I were to change anything to change it to my preferences, it would change the entire integrity of the picture.

